View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 3-15 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |