View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningArchitecture Decision RecordStarfish RetrospectiveStrategy Execution Loop
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 4-12 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance |