View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningArchitecture Decision RecordSailboat RetrospectiveStarfish Retrospective
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 4-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |