View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningArchitecture Decision Record4Ls Retrospectivearc42
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 45–75 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | Team members involved | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |



