methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Six paper cards show a person moving from a problem through a service flow to a completed outcome.
UX Design
Storyboarding
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Purposedifferent
When a usage scenario needs to become understandable early, it condenses situations, context, and flow into a legible sequence. It helps check concept ideas before anything gets built.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-85-10 InterviewsBased on research question10-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Storyboard, Concept Narrative, Testable AssumptionsSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations
Tagsno overlap
VisualizationConceptsSequencePrototype
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Information architectureNavigationFindability
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
Add more methods