View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Storyboarding |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a usage scenario needs to become understandable early, it condenses situations, context, and flow into a legible sequence. It helps check concept ideas before anything gets built. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Storyboard, Concept Narrative, Testable Assumptions | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections |
Tagsno overlap | VisualizationConceptsSequencePrototype | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | KnowledgeMappingRisk | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange |