methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Six paper cards show a person moving from a problem through a service flow to a completed outcome.
UX Design
Storyboarding
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
When a usage scenario needs to become understandable early, it condenses situations, context, and flow into a legible sequence. It helps check concept ideas before anything gets built.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min15-45 min30 min Setup, dann laufend1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
1-81-31-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone1-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Storyboard, Concept Narrative, Testable AssumptionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleRAID Log, Status Report SourceContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
VisualizationConceptsSequencePrototype
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods