View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Splitting |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |  Agile Scrum |  Engineering Kanban |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify. | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | Ongoing |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 4-10 | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 2-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Smaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split Rationale | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics |
Tagsno overlap | BacklogIterationDelivery | LeanFlowWasteDelivery | AgileIterationCadence | FlowVisual managementDelivery |