View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Splitting |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile Scrum |  Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-6 | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Smaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split Rationale | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | BacklogIterationDelivery | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AgileIterationCadence | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |