methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Story Splitting method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Story Splitting
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration of Dual Track Agile with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Dual-Track Agile
Paper illustration of Product Kata with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Product Kata
Purposedifferent
When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream.Product Kata helps clarify customer problems, solution ideas, and evidence through a repeatable improvement routine. It captures direction, current metric, target metric, experiment notes, and learning.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min2-5 min je ItemLaufend, Wochen bis Monate1-2 Wochen je Loop
Participantsdifferent
2-63-94-103-10
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Smaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split RationaleRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesDiscovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte StoriesDirection, Current metric, Target metric, Experiment note, Learning report
Tagsno overlap
BacklogIterationDelivery
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
AgileDiscoveryDelivery
OutcomesDiscoveryLearningIterationCoaching
Add more methods