methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Story Splitting method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Story Splitting
Paper illustration of Cost of Delay with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Cost of Delay
Paper illustration of Dual Track Agile with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Dual-Track Agile
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Purposedifferent
When a story becomes too large for a clean flow, it breaks scope down along value and risk. It shapes the work into a form that ships earlier and is easier to verify.Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence.When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream.Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min90-180 minLaufend, Wochen bis Monate45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-84-102-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Smaller Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Split RationaleCoD Table, Prioritization SequenceDiscovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte StoriesAssumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan
Tagsno overlap
BacklogIterationDelivery
PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision
AgileDiscoveryDelivery
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
Add more methods