View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Points |  Agile T-Shirt Sizing |  Agile ROAM Board |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 15-45 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 2-12 | 3-15 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | ROAM Board, Owner List | GQM Table, Metric Profiles |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileMeasurement | EstimationAgileRoadmap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment |