methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
laufend, 1-5 min je Item20-40 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-93-153-63-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataROAM Board, Owner ListGQM Table, Metric ProfilesHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
EstimationAgileMeasurement
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods