View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Facilitation World Café | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60-180 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 12-100+ | 4-12 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |



