methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min45-90 min1-4 Wochen1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-124-121-6Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods