methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Paper illustration of Lean Startup with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Lean Startup
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min45-90 minWochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-124-122-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement ActionsHypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decisionStarfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
LeanStartupValidationMVP
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
Add more methods