methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min30 min Setup, dann laufend20-40 min initial, dann laufend45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-153-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsRAID Log, Status Report SourceROAM Board, Owner ListExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods