methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min0.5-2 Tage30-60 min45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1220-500+3-10Team members involved
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsSession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods