methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min30-60 min15-45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-123-101-34-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods