methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Purposedifferent
When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min10-20 min daily45-90 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1214-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement ActionsLessons learned, Action items, Event summary
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
LearningOperationsImprovement
Add more methods