methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 minUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter1-3 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-12Scrum Team3-103-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Starfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsImprovement actions, Team agreementsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tags1 shared
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods