methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 hUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-10Scrum Team3-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Starfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsImprovement actions, Team agreementsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tags1 shared
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods