methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Purposedifferent
When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min30-60 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-122-103-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Starfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
DecisionRolesGovernance
Add more methods