methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min20-45 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-121-83-103-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Starfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tags1 shared
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods