methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45–75 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-12Team members involved3-124-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tags2 shared
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods