View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Standard Work Analysis |  UX Research HEART Framework |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 Wochen | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-6 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProcessQuality | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | UX researchObservationContext | LeanObservationProcessOperations |