View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Standard Work Analysis |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Product Strategy Lean Canvas |  Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProcessQuality | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |