methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Contradiction Analysis.
Innovation
Contradiction Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-30 min60-120 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-62-62-82-8
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training NeedsRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresContradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept IdeasCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
LeanProcessQuality
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods