View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Standard Work Analysis | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45–75 min | 30-120 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | Team members involved | 2-6 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProcessQuality | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LeanObservationProcessOperations | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |



