View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Stakeholder Salience ModelRoot Cause AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisAlignment Mapping
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Operations Root Cause Analysis | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 1-4 h | 2-6 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-8 | 3-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



