View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Innovation Crazy 8s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 5-20 min | 1-2 h | 8-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-20 | 4-12 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint |