View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 90-180 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



