View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60–90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-15 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | ROAM Board, Owner List | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |