methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for Weekly Review.
Operations
Weekly Review
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.In a week with many open loops, the method creates distance from operational noise. It organizes commitments, calendar, and projects so the next week becomes workable.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter30-60 min10-20 min daily20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team113-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsUpdated Task System, Weekly Focus, Next ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesLessons learned, Action items, Event summary
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
ProductivityExecutionPlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
LearningOperationsImprovement
Add more methods