methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter15-30 min Planung, laufend20-45 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team13-121
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsBlocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanLessons learned, Action items, Event summaryDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
PlanningTime managementFocus
LearningOperationsImprovement
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods