methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter1-3 h1-2 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team3-101-43-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsProcess Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
ProcessOperationsImprovement
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Add more methods