methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter10-20 min dailyHalber Tag20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team15-203-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksLessons learned, Action items, Event summary
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
ResilienceOperationsIncident
LearningOperationsImprovement
Add more methods