methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper illustration for Weekly Review.
Operations
Weekly Review
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.In a week with many open loops, the method creates distance from operational noise. It organizes commitments, calendar, and projects so the next week becomes workable.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter20-45 min30-60 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team3-1213-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsLessons learned, Action items, Event summaryUpdated Task System, Weekly Focus, Next ActionsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
LearningOperationsImprovement
ProductivityExecutionPlanning
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Add more methods