methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper notes move from an inbox to action, project and calendar collections.
Operations
Getting Things Done
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Purposedifferent
When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter20-45 min1-2 h Setup, laufend1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Scrum Team3-1213-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Improvement actions, Team agreementsLessons learned, Action items, Event summaryAction Lists, Project List, Review RoutineLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
LearningOperationsImprovement
ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Add more methods