View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Sprint Retrospective |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter | 30-60 min | 30-120 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Scrum Team | 1-5 | 2-6 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Improvement actions, Team agreements | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | LeanObservationProcessOperations | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |