View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Team Charter | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 2-4 h | 2-5 min je Item | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-12 | 3-9 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tags1 shared | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TeamCollaborationAgile |



