View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | Half day | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-15 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Spotify Model Map, Action List | ROAM Board, Owner List | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | TeamCollaborationAgile |



