View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-12 | 3-12 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tags1 shared | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |