View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation World Café |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 60-180 min | 20-40 min pro Story | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 12-100+ | 3-6 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |