View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Three Amigos |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-4 h | 15-30 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-12 | 3 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | TeamCollaborationAgile |