View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 10-20 min je Frage | 20-40 min pro Story | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 6-50 | 3-6 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | LearningDialogueFacilitation | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |