View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min je Interview | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 5-12 Interviews | 4-10 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity |