View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Innovation Brainwriting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When loud voices or hierarchy distort the idea search, the method creates a quiet entry into joint development. It gives everyone thinking space and gathers contributions without social brakes, making diversity more visible and easier to build on. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 15-45 min | 20-40 min pro Story | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-10 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Idea sheets, Expanded concepts, Prioritized list |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | BrainstormingCollaborationInclusionIdeas |