View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Agile Three Amigos |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-3 h | 15-30 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-12 | 3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | KnowledgeMappingRisk | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |