View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations Family Tree Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations MORT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident |